I know many have read articles from the 2 investors, please bear with me, it is for the benefit of everyone.
Heres Peter Lynch's categories which in my opinion covers quite pretty much everything
- Slow growers - Tracks GDP, high dividend yields, PE is not crucial here (in fact most are high)
- Stalwarts - Large firms,10-12% growth (returns <= 50% in 2 years), rotational and
- Fast growers - 20-25% growth, growth / PE >1 (High returns)
- Cyclicals - Some mistaken for Stalwarts, follow economic cycles, timing important but hard. Sometimes think buy high PE, sell low PE
- Turnarounds - Depressed firms, stages fast comeback when successful
- Asset opportunities - Hidden asset values, requires industry working knowledge
Here' Warren Buffett's categories as stated in his early partnership letters
- Control (1956) - situations requiring majority ownership of the firm
- Workouts (1956) - situations involving restructuring, turnaround and others not correlated to market
- Generals - very undervalued (1956)
- Generals- relatively undervalued (1965)
Overall #4 would have generated some good and some disasters, overall I believe for a small capital, staying 100% vested is important and still result in positive returns versus a benchmark.In times of high valuations, it is hard to find #3, while #1 and #2 historically is hard to find and onerous to manage.
Updates (6 April 2010)
Some of my close friends not in the investment field asked me how to survive with a small capital.
My answer was precisely when you have a small capital base, it is far easier to produce out-sized returns which I will explain in a later post.
I have a small capital base and below are some of the criteria I employ:
Happy investing, best regards.allocation, Peter Lynch, Warren Buffett, portfolio, workouts, stalwarts, cyclicals, turnaround
Some of my close friends not in the investment field asked me how to survive with a small capital.
My answer was precisely when you have a small capital base, it is far easier to produce out-sized returns which I will explain in a later post.
I have a small capital base and below are some of the criteria I employ:
- Abnormally large margin of safety
- Foreseeable catalyst to unlock the value realization
- Positions that are little correlated to the market
- Preferably no institutions cover it
Happy investing, best regards.
3 comments:
hi mervyn, your blog is genius. i'll come by more frequently to check out in the future.
Thanks Zhongyi, hopefully in years to come, I can look back at this blog and see the performance of my analysis and the good quality of ideas and informational exchange.
Great asset allocation.
Post a Comment